> They are 100% correct about the spatial Finder 15 years later and what the current OS has is still laughable compared to some of the gems of the Classic Finder.Īnd every version that comes out, the Finder moves further away from spacial and towards a disk browser. It would have been better to combine the vibrancy technology with more professional user interface elements reminiscent of Classic. While I do like the “vibrancy” effect in parts of the current OS, even that is overdone (scrolling under toolbars, really?). They “almost” had it when 10.5 Leopard managed to unify most of the OS and apps but then they started fiddling again. Today’s toolbar icons and buttons are downright ugly compared to the UI that was achieved with far fewer colors on Classic Macs. From small details (like EVERY window remembering exactly how you arranged it) to not having to wonder what will happen when you click something, not to mention the pop-up tab windows from 8.5+.Īlso, to this day I don’t quite understand why Apple went so far away from Platinum. You sort of have to experience the Classic Finder to understand just how wrong the modern Finder really is. A few years back Steve Jobs had the audacity to describe some Cocoa rewrite as a “whole new Finder” and I got excited only to realize it was still garbage. They are 100% correct about the spatial Finder 15 years later and what the current OS has is still laughable compared to some of the gems of the Classic Finder.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |